Moving from a High Tax State to a Low or No Tax State: Opportunities, Challenges, and What You Need to Know

By Rick Bell, CKA® – Partner, Regional Director, Wealth Advisor at Waverly Advisors, LLC

Relocation has always been about lifestyle, but for many individuals and families, it is also about strategy. Moving from a high tax state to a low or no tax state may reduce ongoing tax obligations, preserve more of a family’s wealth for future generations and support broader life goals. While the potential benefits are compelling, the decision is not simple. States differ widely in their tax treatment of income, capital gains, retirement withdrawals and estate transfers. Residency rules can be complex, especially when someone maintains ties to more than one state. Lifestyle adjustments—from climate to cost of living—also carry long-term implications.

This article explores the financial benefits, lifestyle and business considerations, the types of individuals most likely to benefit, state-by-state contrasts and the complexities of changing domicile. Each section concludes with a sample case study, for illustrative purposes only, to demonstrate how these considerations may play out in practice.

Relocation to a state with little or no income tax can have an immediate effect on household cash flow. Beyond income tax, it also may impact capital gains, retirement distributions and estate planning. Some states impose income tax rates exceeding 10%, while others impose none. States also differ on whether they tax gains from the sale of securities, businesses or real estate. Pension and IRA distributions may be taxed in some jurisdictions but exempt in others. A few states still levy estate or inheritance taxes, though many have eliminated them.

Case Study: Saving Taxes in Retirement

James and Linda, both in their early seventies, had spent decades in New Jersey. Their retirement income came from pensions, required minimum distributions and investment earnings. Their annual state tax bill exceeded $40,000. They wanted to understand how Florida’s lack of state income tax would affect their retirement withdrawals, whether they needed to update estate documents and how keeping a vacation home in New Jersey might complicate their change of domicile claim. They purchased a Florida home, established domicile by changing driver’s licenses and voter registrations and worked with their attorney to redraft estate documents. To remove any ambiguity, they sold their New Jersey residence.  The couple eliminated state income tax on their pensions and RMDs, saving nearly $40,000 annually, while updating their estate plan to comply with Florida law. Their example demonstrates that relocation can immediately reduce income and investment tax burdens, though it also requires updating legal documents and, often, parting ways with real property in high-tax states.

Beyond financial considerations, relocation often improves more than just tax efficiency. Many low or no tax states also offer a lower cost of living, warmer climates and a more favorable business environment. Housing, utilities and everyday expenses are often cheaper, and outdoor activities attract both retirees and families. States such as Texas and Florida have reputations for being business-friendly, with less regulation and lower operating costs. The rise of remote work has given professionals more flexibility to live where they prefer while maintaining income levels.

Case Study: Selling a Business

Maria, a fifty-eight-year-old business owner, operated a successful consulting firm in San Francisco and planned to sell her company. California’s 13.3% income tax would consume a large portion of the proceeds, and she sought a lower cost of living and an environment supportive of her next venture. Timing the move relative to her business sale, ensuring compliance with Texas domicile rules and balancing her team’s operations in California were her primary concerns. With guidance, she established domicile in Austin, Texas before the sale, relocated her executive office and worked with legal and financial advisors to restructure her trust documents. By closing her sale as a Texas resident (she had to relocate before the deal was at the “letter of intent” phase, not right before closing), Maria avoided California’s high state tax on the proceeds, saving millions of dollars. She also lowered her living costs and positioned herself for future ventures in a business-friendly state. Her experience highlights that relocation can improve both quality of life and long-term financial outcomes, though the timing of a move relative to a major transaction is critical.

Certain individuals stand to benefit more than others from relocation. Business owners may maximize benefits by coordinating a move around a liquidity event. Retirees often seek lower taxes on distributions and an appealing climate, while high-income earners can see annual savings compound significantly over time.

Case Study:  High Income Earners

Ethan, a forty-five-year-old senior executive based in New York, earned more than $2,000,000 annually and paid over $200,000 in state taxes each year. With a role that allowed frequent remote work, he explored Tennessee as a no-tax alternative. His challenge was ensuring Tennessee domicile would withstand scrutiny while revising his equity compensation strategy. Ethan purchased a home in Nashville, registered to vote there, obtained a driver’s license and carefully documented his time outside New York. He also restructured his equity compensation with advisor guidance. As a result, Ethan reduced his annual tax liability significantly while maintaining professional flexibility. He also prepared for potential audits by maintaining meticulous records, demonstrating that relocation is most advantageous for high-income earners who are disciplined about documentation and compliance.

The contrast between high-tax and no-tax states can be striking. California, New York, New Jersey and Illinois impose some of the steepest tax rates in the nation, while Florida, Texas, Tennessee and Nevada levy none. However, tax savings are only one piece of the decision. Families also must consider healthcare access, education, housing markets and proximity to relatives. The Patel family, longtime residents of New York, analyzed whether a move to Florida would make sense. Their analysis included projected state taxes, in-state tuition residency rules, and proximity to extended family. After careful review, they purchased a Florida home, established residency through licenses and voter registration, and applied for a homestead exemption. They retained a small rental in New York for occasional visits. The family reduced their tax liability by over $100,000 annually, while recognizing and accepting higher travel costs and time away from extended family. Their decision underscores that while tax savings can be substantial, relocation should balance both tangible and emotional considerations.

Case Study: Preparing for a Potential Audit

Relocation is not as simple as buying a home in a new state – you must show that the “center of your life” has changed. States with high tax burdens often challenge domicile changes aggressively. Common pitfalls include retaining significant property or business interests in the former state, spending too much time there, maintaining inconsistent legal and financial records, and spouses claiming different domiciles. A common thread in residency disputes is that risk increases in proportion to the ties one maintains with the former state. The simplest way to prove a new domicile is to fully disconnect from the previous one. Retaining a vacation property increases the risk of audit—and of losing that audit. Similarly, if one spouse claims residency in a low or no tax state while the other remains domiciled in a high-tax state, the lines blur, raising the likelihood of both being audited and facing a weaker case during review.

Mark and Susan, for example, split their time between New York and Florida. They claimed Florida residency but kept a Manhattan apartment, spent nearly half the year in New York, and retained New York-based doctors and accounts. With professional guidance, they shifted their banking, physicians, and memberships to Florida, meticulously documented their time in each state, and eventually sold their New York apartment. They successfully defended their Florida domicile during a New York residency audit, but only because they had comprehensive records and lifestyle consistency to back up their claim. Their case illustrates that establishing domicile requires both paperwork and lifestyle alignment.

While these principles apply broadly, New Jersey provides a particularly clear example of how aggressively a state can pursue residency disputes. The state presumes that domicile continues until proven otherwise, and its courts have repeatedly held that retaining a New Jersey residence is strong evidence against a claimed domicile change. The risk of losing an audit rises as one’s connections to New Jersey deepen. For those who keep a vacation home, success depends on demonstrating that the property is truly for limited use. It is essential to clearly designate the home as vacation-only, to keep one’s primary residence, driver’s license and mailing address in the new state, and to avoid using the New Jersey address for tax returns or legal documents. Official records such as voter registration, vehicle registration, banking and healthcare should all be based in the new domicile. Time spent in New Jersey should be limited to vacation periods, while the new state should reflect deeper life integration—schools, community involvement, religious ties and medical providers.

Problems arise when individuals use their New Jersey property as a mailing address, spend significant portions of the year there or keep a New Jersey driver’s license or voter registration. Maintaining business or employment connections tied to the New Jersey address compounds the risk. It is not the mere ownership of a home that creates exposure, but the extent to which one’s daily life still revolves around it. When the New Jersey property is clearly a secondary or vacation residence, and permanent connections are established elsewhere, the argument for a new domicile becomes much stronger.

The issue becomes even more complex when spouses claim different domiciles. Legally, domicile is an individual concept and courts recognize that each spouse can establish domicile separately if the facts support it. However, such situations attract heightened scrutiny. The New Jersey Division of Taxation and courts will look closely at where the family home is located, where children live and attend school, how joint property is maintained and how taxes are filed. If one spouse claims Florida domicile while the other remains in New Jersey, auditors may argue that the family unit is still New Jersey-based. Filing joint federal returns can further complicate matters, as the state may argue that pooled income implies shared residency. Filing “Married Filing Separately” at both the federal and state levels may strengthen each spouse’s position, though it can have adverse tax trade-offs.

Split domicile tends to work best when one spouse truly relocates—selling property interests, establishing full residency in the new state and taking clear steps such as obtaining a driver’s license, registering to vote and claiming a homestead exemption—while the other remains in New Jersey for legitimate reasons such as career or family obligations. Clean financial and lifestyle separation is essential. Spouses may maintain different domiciles, but the audit risk is high. To succeed, each must maintain consistent and documented evidence of domicile. The more blurred the facts, the more likely New Jersey is to challenge and prevail.

New Jersey’s approach illustrates how domicile disputes are evaluated: it is less about what you declare and more about what your actions and connections reveal. The more clearly your life is centered in your new state, and the more thoroughly you minimize ties to your former one, the stronger your case will be if challenged.

Moving from a high tax state to a low or no tax state can reduce tax burdens and improve quality of life. Relocation is particularly impactful for retirees, business owners and high-income earners, but it requires deliberate actions, detailed documentation and often a willingness to let go of old ties. Successful relocation integrates tax, estate, business and lifestyle planning in a coordinated way.

Relocating from a high tax state to a low or no tax state can provide compelling opportunities, but it is not without complexity. The tax benefits, estate planning implications and lifestyle changes must be carefully weighed and aligned with long-term financial goals. Before making a decision, clients should consult with a professional advisor who has a strong focus in financial planning to evaluate whether relocation is the right move for them and their family. With proper planning, one may pursue both financial efficiency and lifestyle improvement in a new state.

Richard W. Bell, Jr., CKA®, is a Partner, Regional Director, and Wealth Advisor at Waverly Advisors, LLC. He advises high-net-worth individuals, multigenerational families, business owners, and executives on complex financial planning matters, including state tax exposure, domicile planning, wealth transfer, and long-term legacy strategy. With decades of experience working with affluent families, Rick brings an integrated approach that coordinates investment management, tax-aware planning, estate and trust design, and business succession considerations. His approach emphasizes disciplined analysis, documentation, and coordination across legal, tax, and financial frameworks, helping families navigate complexity with clarity and confidence.

Important Disclosure: Waverly Advisors, LLC (“Waverly”) is an SEC-registered investment adviser. A copy of Waverly’s current written disclosure Brochure and Form CRS (Customer Relationship Summary) discussing our advisory services and fees remains available at https://waverly-advisors.com/. Please Note: The scope of the services to be provided depends upon the needs of the client and the terms of the engagement. You should not assume that any information provided serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice from Waverly Advisors, LLC (“Waverly”). This article reflects information available at the time it was written and should be used as a reference only. Talk to your Waverly advisor, or a professional advisor of your choosing, for the most current information and for guidance specific to your situation.